Monday, June 21, 2010

Where are you Going to, Where have you Been?

This last Saturday, I found myself in a conversation concerning regret.  This is usually an un-troubling topic for me because I try my best to embrace the old maxim that it's easier to regret the things you have done than the things you haven't (it really is) and that maxim's close cousin: it is easier to ask for forgiveness than to get permission.

But that doesn't mean I have no regrets.  Indeed, just because it's presumably easier to regret something you have done as opposed to something you haven't doesn't mean by any stretch of the imagination that I don't do regrettable things.  Nevermind what they are - sufficed to say I've done them.

Not quite that bad, but pretty bad

The important thing to remember about dealing with regret is that it can only make you feel as bad as you let it.  That's a paraphrase of an Eleanor Roosevelt quote I've always liked (and have used before), but it's apt. Each of us has a million and one things we can look at from our past that make us cringe, but the question to ask yourself is:  why?  

I would lump most of my regrettable actions into things that were at the time embarrassing.  No, I'm not going to say what they were - just imagine one of your own embarrassing little faux pas and assume that it was I who committed it.  But the funny thing about embarrassment is that typically, you are the only person who remembers it. Thus, it seems that any regret stemming from embarrassment should abate within a reasonably short span of time after committing the act. 

This picture is so quintessentially internet that now it's not

And yet it doesn't.  Such incidents haunt us years after the fact and we slink around with our heads down, ashamed, remembering drunk texts, inappropriate comments, and spectacular pratfalls.  To what end?  For what purpose? Surely, some Neck-bearded Ladder Theorist / Evolutionary Psychologist would point out that the point of remembering embarrassing incidents is so that you remember not to commit them again, a hypothesis that I'm actually willing to accept at face value, so as far as I'm concerned I'm satisfied.  Someone calls you out for having your fly down = learn to not walk around with your fly down.  Good enough for moi.  

Cool story, bro - I award you 1000 internets

But what about the bigger regrets?  What about something like getting locked into a house that's now 100% underwater?  What about marrying someone you shouldn't have?  What about those big life-changing decisions you made 5-10 years ago that are only now starting to catch up with you?  What about the things so huge that learning not to do them again would be moot? 

My contention is that these things, though typically called "regrettable decisions," are not actually cause for regret.  I'm not one usually for talking about "sin" in any traditional context, but regret to me is tantamount to despair - where despair is the hopelessness and helplessness that eventually leads to self-destruction, regret is a disavowal of one's own past, a desire to have the past be different, and thus affect the present.  It is despair in reverse - a despair of the past.

GTFO n00bs!

For me, at any rate, it's worth looking at Western last names, and I of course mean the really obvious ones:  Miller, Smith, Shepherd, Cooper, and so on. In Western culture, what you do very much defines who you are, to the point that your twelve-times great grandfather's job gave your entire line the last name you have.  To regret is to resent what you have done, and to resent what you have done is in part a reflection of self-resentment.  No, a person is not entirely what they have done, but action informs perception, including self-perception.

I posted a picture of Adam and Eve's expulsion from the Garden of Eden for good reason, and to explain it I would invoke a quote:  In every life, some rain must fall.  Not could, not might, but  must.  I find this to be delightfully profound - the notion that a life is not a life at all without hardship.  Those dark and damp experiences that we so often regret are in fact formative.  No, not all "rain" is simply regrettable action, but regrettable action certainly fits within that category. 

 Fuckin' metaphors - how do they work?

So of those actions that cause hardship - I say embrace them.  Get to know them.  Consider:  did you know at the time that your action would end badly?  If not, well, that's nothing to feel bad about - the market tanked, your wife went frigid, your husband is a bum, well, these things happen, often without warning.  The other point to consider is:  can you do something about it now?  Then do so.  Fix the problem, you'll feel better, and if the problem is unfix-able, then at least you can learn to live with it.  Embrace what you've done as a contributing element of identity, and remember that identity is fluid.  Don't like being the guy who got drunk and told off all his friends?  Don't be.  Do something else to outshine that facet of your being, but own up to it - be it for a little while, and then do something else that merits being something else. 

This all sounds very new-age self-helpy, but it's been on my mind for a couple of days. If you want something less maudlin, how about running around screaming "NO REGRETS! WOOOOO!"  Or if you want something more maudlin, you could also say "The only thing constant...is CHANGE!!!111one."  Either way, just remember - nobody cares about this shit as much as you do, and only you can do anything about it.

***When you buy off Amazon through this site, I make money***

4 comments:

  1. Very thoughtful post...

    I find "dealing with" regret to be a sub-category of forgiveness -- Your topic being, essentially, forgiveness of one's self. It's good advice: Own up to your mistake, realize the inherent value of the experience, and move forward refusing to let a mistake or two define who you are.

    Here's a twist, though: Would your advice be as easily applied when the source of wrong-doing was external (e.g., Abusive parents, Drunk driver mows down your kids)? Can you truly control your destiny and identity ("move on") without forgiving the assailant? Is it in man's nature to do such a thing, even if for purely selfish reasons (i.e., "I'll be forever enslaved to this event, unable to improve, if I don't move on.")? Or, do you accept the event's permanent impact on your identity, and spin it into something positive (e.g., John Walsh)?
    ReplyDelete
  2. There's an interesting line that people have to draw for themselves in this mix, and that's the self/other line - when do other things inform my identity, and what do I do or make for myself. It takes tremendous force of will to adapt to external influence, to internalize what can strengthen and heal you and to reject or expel what will hurt or weaken you.

    To that end, it's certainly beyond reasonable expectation to assume anyone could withstand the trial of Job and then go do the happy dance, and yet with our without religious implications (eg, whether you take the story as gospel or as parable), that exact book teaches a valuable lesson in dealing with adversity. For Job, of course, it was faith in the ultimate benevolence of He Who Is Called I Am, but from a secular existence it could be merely a trust in the persistence of time to dim the glare of past wrongs and to sooth the pain of loss, or of one's personal survival instinct to overcome despair (though the two worldviews need not be mutually exclusive).

    So there isn't a single answer to any of these questions - I hope I've managed to make it clear throughout that this is how _I_ deal with hardship and regret, and that I recommend that sort of internalization and catharsis for anyone who can take it, but in the end it's a very personal decision: to what degree will one let external events shape their identity and worldview.

    This whole conversation regarding regret was indirectly touched off by the short video I'm about to link to. It's a snippet of a lecture by Phil Zimbardo (of Stanford Prison Experiment fame) in which he talks about the six sort of time zones in which people live. I think he makes some very cogent points (and a few broad, sweeping, and uncomfortable generalities as well).

    I think looking at these time-themed perceptions as past / present /future and then positive or negative is informative, especially in the context of regret and forgiveness. I hope you find it worth your time. I mean, again - beware of some sloppy science, but - I think this is a good lump of fat to chew.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg

    (Short answer: I'm a big one for reversing impacts - learning resilience through adversity and that sort of thing, but at the end of the day I'm kind of a stoic, and definitely kind of a taoist, so there's my perspective on the matter: the way that can be spoken of is not the constant way and all that business.)
    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not a regret believer. I believe life is about the journey and everything is an experience. Are they all good, no. But they help to define who you are and where you are going. With out a bad decision maybe i don't make good decisions. That's just my .02 on the topic.
    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that pretty much sums it up!
    ReplyDelete